Re: draft-richardson-ipsec-opportunistic-11 again]

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <200304160146.h3G1kJhu006759@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>, Micha
el Richardson writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>>>>>> "RFC" == RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> writes:
>    RFC> We still have not heard a response regarding this document.  Please
>    RFC> let us know if this draft will be reviewed in the WG, or if the RFC
>    RFC> Editor should be reviewing this document. 
>
>  My opinion is that it is inappropriate for IPSECKEY as presently chartered.
>
>  I thought that SMB had agreed. I will let him confirm himself.
>

Yes, I agree.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)