[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-richardson-ipsec-opportunistic-11 again]

[other CCs deleted]
didn't Steve or someone have the job of penning a suitable IESG note to point out that this is "just" documenting historical practice, and should be OBE once IPSECKEY finishes?

Harald

--On 15. april 2003 21:59 -0400 "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> wrote:

In message <200304160146.h3G1kJhu006759@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>,
Micha el Richardson writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----



"RFC" == RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> writes:

   RFC> We still have not heard a response regarding this document.
   Please RFC> let us know if this draft will be reviewed in the WG, or
   if the RFC RFC> Editor should be reviewing this document.

 My opinion is that it is inappropriate for IPSECKEY as presently
 chartered.

 I thought that SMB had agreed. I will let him confirm himself.


Yes, I agree.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)