Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec

[Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>]

Alex:

Number 1 is obviously minor.  However, number 2 is a DISCUSS.  There is no 
way that anyone could implement anything from the sentence in the document.

I just saw a note from Steve, and he clearly has similar views about this 
section.

Russ

At 11:40 AM 4/16/2003 -0700, Alex Zinin wrote:
> Russ,
>
>   Thanks, I'll ask the authors to come back with an rfc-ed note.
>
>   BTW, could you please clarify if this is a 'DISCUSS' or a 'NO-OB
>   with comments'?
>
>   Thanks.
>
> --
> Alex
> http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
>
> Wednesday, April 16, 2003, 10:25:10 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> > Two minor comments on draft-ietf-msdp-spec:
>
> > 1.  Please spell out "PIM-SM" the first time it is used.
>
> > 2.  In section 15, please provide a reference for MD5 and how it would be
> > used in this context.
>
> > Russ