Re: [iesg-secretary #6626] Draft Minutes from April 17, 2003 Telechat

["Jacqueline Hargest" <jhargest@foretec.com>]

Your request #6626 was updated by jhargest:

Thomas had the 'Defer' for this document.  Apologies for 
mistakenly marking him an "Abstain" instead.  It has now been 
corrected.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
>To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: Draft Minutes from April 17, 2003 Telechat

Mmmm it says:
> 4. Protocol Actions Deferred:
> 
.. snip ..

> 	o Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching Architecture 
>         (Proposed Standard) 
>  	     <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt>
> 
But in the ballot at:
  https://www.ietf.org/IESG/EVALUATIONS/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture.bal
I cannot see who then took a Defer,
And I do not see it in my own notes either.
Did anyone indeed take a Defer?
I know I have a few DISCUSSes to clear.

Bert