Re: draft-sun-handle-* & draft-irtf-idrm-handle-system

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

(Sorry, moved IESG mailing list mailbox to an "old" area of the 
mailboxes...so 7 email have ended up there not found until now... I am 
VERY sorry)

On onsdag, apr 9, 2003, at 03:11 Europe/Stockholm, Ted Hardie wrote:

> 	So, according to the tracker, the successor documents that Bob 
> Braden's note
> referenced earlier are on my plate after the transition.  Looking
> through the history here, it looks like Patrik had consulted with 
> Michael
> Mealling and Leslie Daigle on these documents, and had come
> to the conclusion that they needed an IESG Note.  Here is the
> text of the note he proposed:
>
> > IESG Note:
> >
> > IETF have discussed the Handle system in the realm of URI related
> > working groups. IESG want to point out that there is not IETF  
> > consensus
> > on the current design of the Handle system, and where it fits in the
> > IETF architecture. IESG is of the view that that the Handle system
> > should be able to, with very small changes, fit in the IETF
> > architecture as a URN namespace.
> 	I've cc'ed Patrik on this note to see if this summary is incorrect.
> Based on my review of that set of exchanges, I would suggest that
> we move forward with publication with that (or a very similar) IESG 
> note.
> Before I put it on the ballot, though, I noted that there didn't seem 
> to
> be a similar note on the _other_ version of these docs, and so I
> want to ask if there are objections out there to taking this way 
> forward.
> Please let me know if you do,
This is 100% correct summary.

  paf