-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Hardie [mailto:hardie@qualcomm.com]
Sent: woensdag 9 april 2003 23:58
To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Cc: paf@cisco.com; iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16
Hi Bert,
Shifted the cc set to paf and current IESG in order to discuss a
tracker issue. Checking the state in the tracker, it shows
as one of
the ones that
shifted to me in the transition. It's kind of in an odd
state, though,
as
it shows in "waiting for writeup", but the notes indicate
that there was
a write-up. Further, there is a ballot, but it only has two votes:
Patrik's
yes, and discuss from Steve, noting the stringprep issue.
I'd suggest we re-ballot this one. I don't see
additional problems
with it based on a cursory review, but I do think we will
have to insert
IESG text essentially saying that we're approving it for publication
knowing it will have to recycle at proposed once the stringprep issue
shakes out. Given the state of the ballot, I think it would
be easier
to
just put this back through the ballot to get buy off on that.
Does that make sense to you,and to others?
regards,
Ted
On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 02:43 PM, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
Can Patrik or one of the current APPS ADs update me
on where we are with this draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema
It seems that one of my WG's RFC-to-be is hanging in
that because of a normative reference.
Thanks,
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
Sent: woensdag 9 april 2003 23:17
To: remoore@us.ibm.com
Cc: Joyce Reynolds; bwijnen@lucent.com; ellesson@mindspring.com;
john.strassner@intelliden.com; randy@psg.com;
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org;
rmoats@lemurnetworks.net; Ted Hardie; ned.freed@mrochek.com;
paf@cisco.com
Subject: Re: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16
Bob,
Bob Moore wrote:
Hi Kurt,
This is a reference to that document of yours that defined
one or two
matching rules that weren't defined elsewhere. What
should we refer
to
now?
draft-ietf-policy-core-schema should continue to reference
draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema.
draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema is being considered by the IESG
for publication as a Proposed Status. Details can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/IESG/EVALUATIONS/draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-
schema.bal
I note that Steve Bellovin raised a "discuss" which, if I recall
correctly, I have responded to. Basically, I stated that the
"stringprep" issue is being addressed by the LDAPBIS WG but
it will be some time before closure. I suggested that
draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema go forward as a Proposed Standard,
possible with an IESG note stating that "stringprep" issues need
to be addressed before this technical specification will be
furthered on the Standard Track, so that
draft-ietf-policy-core-schema
can be published as a Proposed Standard. Otherwise,
draft-ietf-policy-core-schema will be in REF wait for another
6+ months as LDAPBIS needs 3+ months to wrap up its work.
Note: this "stringprep" issue relates directly to the matching
rule specifications which draft-ietf-policy-core-schema is
referencing.
Kurt
Regards,
Bob
Bob Moore
WebSphere Advanced Design and Technology
WebSphere Platform System House
IBM Software Group
+1-919-254-4436
remoore@us.ibm.com
Joyce Reynolds <jkrey@ISI.EDU>
04/09/2003 02:29 PM
Please respond to Joyce Reynolds
To: john.strassner@intelliden.com, Robert
Moore/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, rmoats@lemurnetworks.net,
ellesson@mindspring.com
cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, bwijnen@lucent.com,
randy@psg.com
Subject: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16
Folks,
The RFC Editor is getting ready to publish:
<draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16>
In the "Normative References" section, there is a document that we
cannot account for:
[9] K. Zeilenga, ed., "LDAPv3: A
Collection of User
Schema",
<draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema-06.txt>, May
2002.
What is the current state/status of this reference?
Thanks, Joyce
(for RFC Editor)