RE: FW: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Makes sense to me. Maybe Steve can recall what his issue
was? 

Can you get it on next telechat please. That policy doc has been
in RFCC-Editor queue for a loooonnnggg time already

Paf... what is your recollection of this?

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Hardie [mailto:hardie@qualcomm.com]
> Sent: woensdag 9 april 2003 23:58
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: paf@cisco.com; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16
> 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> 	Shifted the cc set to paf and current IESG in order to discuss a
> tracker issue.  Checking the state in the tracker, it shows 
> as one of  
> the ones that
> shifted to me in the transition.  It's kind of in an odd 
> state, though,  
> as
> it shows in "waiting for writeup", but the notes indicate 
> that there was
> a write-up.  Further, there is a ballot, but it only has two votes:   
> Patrik's
> yes, and discuss from Steve, noting the stringprep issue.
> 	I'd suggest we re-ballot this one.  I don't see 
> additional problems
> with it based on a cursory review, but I do think we will 
> have to insert
> IESG text essentially saying that we're approving it for publication
> knowing it will have to recycle at proposed once the stringprep issue
> shakes out.  Given the state of the ballot, I think it would 
> be easier  
> to
> just put this back through the ballot to get buy off on that.
> 	Does that make sense to you,and to others?
> 
> 				regards,
> 						Ted
> 
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 02:43 PM, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> > Can Patrik or one of the current APPS ADs update me
> > on where we are with this draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema
> >
> > It seems that one of my WG's RFC-to-be is hanging in
> > that because of a normative reference.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bert
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
> > Sent: woensdag 9 april 2003 23:17
> > To: remoore@us.ibm.com
> > Cc: Joyce Reynolds; bwijnen@lucent.com; ellesson@mindspring.com;
> > john.strassner@intelliden.com; randy@psg.com;  
> > rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org;
> > rmoats@lemurnetworks.net; Ted Hardie; ned.freed@mrochek.com;
> > paf@cisco.com
> > Subject: Re: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16
> >
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > Bob Moore wrote:
> >> Hi Kurt,
> >> This is a reference to that document of yours that defined 
> one or two
> >> matching rules that weren't defined elsewhere.  What 
> should we refer  
> >> to
> >> now?
> >
> > draft-ietf-policy-core-schema should continue to reference
> > draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema.
> >
> > draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema is being considered by the IESG
> > for publication as a Proposed Status.  Details can be found at:
> >    
> > https://www.ietf.org/IESG/EVALUATIONS/draft-zeilenga-ldap-user- 
> > schema.bal
> >
> > I note that Steve Bellovin raised a "discuss" which, if I recall
> > correctly, I have responded to.  Basically, I stated that the
> > "stringprep" issue is being addressed by the LDAPBIS WG but
> > it will be some time before closure.  I suggested that
> > draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema go forward as a Proposed Standard,
> > possible with an IESG note stating that "stringprep" issues need
> > to be addressed before this technical specification will be
> > furthered on the Standard Track, so that 
> draft-ietf-policy-core-schema
> > can be published as a Proposed Standard.  Otherwise,
> > draft-ietf-policy-core-schema will be in REF wait for another
> > 6+ months as LDAPBIS needs 3+ months to wrap up its work.
> >
> > Note: this "stringprep" issue relates directly to the matching
> > rule specifications which draft-ietf-policy-core-schema is
> > referencing.
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Bob
> >>
> >> Bob Moore
> >> WebSphere Advanced Design and Technology
> >> WebSphere Platform System House
> >> IBM Software Group
> >> +1-919-254-4436
> >> remoore@us.ibm.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Joyce Reynolds <jkrey@ISI.EDU>
> >> 04/09/2003 02:29 PM
> >> Please respond to Joyce Reynolds
> >>
> >>
> >>        To:     john.strassner@intelliden.com, Robert
> >> Moore/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, rmoats@lemurnetworks.net,  
> >> ellesson@mindspring.com
> >>        cc:     rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, bwijnen@lucent.com,
> >> randy@psg.com
> >>        Subject:        RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> The RFC Editor is getting ready to publish:
> >> <draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16>
> >>
> >> In the "Normative References" section, there is a document that we
> >> cannot account for:
> >>
> >>                 [9]   K. Zeilenga, ed., "LDAPv3: A 
> Collection of User
> >> Schema",
> >>                       
> <draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema-06.txt>, May  
> >> 2002.
> >>
> >> What is the current state/status of this reference?
> >>
> >> Thanks, Joyce
> >> (for RFC Editor)
> >
>