[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16

Hi Bert,
Shifted the cc set to paf and current IESG in order to discuss a
tracker issue. Checking the state in the tracker, it shows as one of the ones that
shifted to me in the transition. It's kind of in an odd state, though, as
it shows in "waiting for writeup", but the notes indicate that there was
a write-up. Further, there is a ballot, but it only has two votes: Patrik's
yes, and discuss from Steve, noting the stringprep issue.
I'd suggest we re-ballot this one. I don't see additional problems
with it based on a cursory review, but I do think we will have to insert
IESG text essentially saying that we're approving it for publication
knowing it will have to recycle at proposed once the stringprep issue
shakes out. Given the state of the ballot, I think it would be easier to
just put this back through the ballot to get buy off on that.
Does that make sense to you,and to others?

regards,
Ted

On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 02:43 PM, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

Can Patrik or one of the current APPS ADs update me
on where we are with this draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema

It seems that one of my WG's RFC-to-be is hanging in
that because of a normative reference.

Thanks,
Bert

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
Sent: woensdag 9 april 2003 23:17
To: remoore@us.ibm.com
Cc: Joyce Reynolds; bwijnen@lucent.com; ellesson@mindspring.com;
john.strassner@intelliden.com; randy@psg.com; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org;
rmoats@lemurnetworks.net; Ted Hardie; ned.freed@mrochek.com;
paf@cisco.com
Subject: Re: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16


Bob,

Bob Moore wrote:
Hi Kurt,
This is a reference to that document of yours that defined one or two
matching rules that weren't defined elsewhere. What should we refer to
now?
draft-ietf-policy-core-schema should continue to reference
draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema.

draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema is being considered by the IESG
for publication as a Proposed Status. Details can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/IESG/EVALUATIONS/draft-zeilenga-ldap-user- schema.bal

I note that Steve Bellovin raised a "discuss" which, if I recall
correctly, I have responded to. Basically, I stated that the
"stringprep" issue is being addressed by the LDAPBIS WG but
it will be some time before closure. I suggested that
draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema go forward as a Proposed Standard,
possible with an IESG note stating that "stringprep" issues need
to be addressed before this technical specification will be
furthered on the Standard Track, so that draft-ietf-policy-core-schema
can be published as a Proposed Standard. Otherwise,
draft-ietf-policy-core-schema will be in REF wait for another
6+ months as LDAPBIS needs 3+ months to wrap up its work.

Note: this "stringprep" issue relates directly to the matching
rule specifications which draft-ietf-policy-core-schema is
referencing.

Kurt



Regards,
Bob

Bob Moore
WebSphere Advanced Design and Technology
WebSphere Platform System House
IBM Software Group
+1-919-254-4436
remoore@us.ibm.com





Joyce Reynolds <jkrey@ISI.EDU>
04/09/2003 02:29 PM
Please respond to Joyce Reynolds


To: john.strassner@intelliden.com, Robert
Moore/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, rmoats@lemurnetworks.net, ellesson@mindspring.com
cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, bwijnen@lucent.com,
randy@psg.com
Subject: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16






Folks,

The RFC Editor is getting ready to publish:
<draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16>

In the "Normative References" section, there is a document that we
cannot account for:

[9] K. Zeilenga, ed., "LDAPv3: A Collection of User
Schema",
<draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema-06.txt>, May 2002.

What is the current state/status of this reference?

Thanks, Joyce
(for RFC Editor)