RE: ID-NITS [ was: RE: Re: More IESG comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-cip h-aes-cbc]

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> > I have been saying for quite a while...
> >
> >   We need (as short as possible) a set of NITs that we really care
> > about and that we're willing to enforce. All the others that we are
> > willing to relax on we should relax on and only show them as
> > guidelines or "it would be nice if"... and such... but on 
> that latter
> > set we should then never hold up a document.
> 
> you're right.
> This will be on our retreat agenda: Sorting the nits.
> 
Good and thanks

Bert
>               Harald
>