[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Some nits on: draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema-06.txt

It does not have an IPR section

Section 1 states:
  This document includes a summary of X.500 user schema [X.520] not
  previously specified for use with LDAP.  Some of these items were
  described in the inetOrgPerson [RFC2798] schema.  This document
  supersedes these descriptions, replacing sections 9.1.3 and 9.3.3 of
  RFC 2798.

I believe that in the past, Scott always wanted a statement in the
abstract if a document did update/obsolete some earlier RFC. Might make
sense to indeed do that, so we stay consistent with earlier behaviour


Thanks,
Bert