[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15

To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>, Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:14:41 +0200
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <15644311005.20030416113744@psg.com>
References: <20030416171514.A7F007B4D@berkshire.research.att.com><15644311005.20030416113744@psg.com>

Alex,
given that it's documenting existing implementations only, does that mean that people consider the current MSDP deployment an experiment (and not a very successful one)?

Just curious....

Harald

--On 16. april 2003 11:37 -0700 Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> wrote:

Steve,

  It goes EXP. Sorry for the confusion.

--
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/

Wednesday, April 16, 2003, 10:15:14 AM, Steve Bellovin wrote:

What is the proposed status of draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15?  The agenda
says Experimental; the document itself says standards track.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

References:
- draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15
  - From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
- Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture - Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching Architecture to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Agenda, version zero
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-msdp-spec-15
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread