Re: ID-NITS on: draft-nakajima-camellia-02.txt

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155016A3D41@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.c
om>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
>Long page at 118
>Long line at 547 with 73 chars, only spaces extra
>-: 1 lines longer than 72 characters, max 73
>-: 1 pages longer than 58 lines, max 59 lines	
>
>References not split
>
>IPR section says:
>   5. Intellectual Property Statement
>
>   Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (Mitsubishi Electric) and Nippon
>   Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) have pending applications
>   or filed patents which are essential to Camellia. License policy for
>   these essential patents is available on the IETF page of Intellectual
>   Property Rights Notices.
>
>It seems that Mitsubishi and NTT should report this to IETF Executive
>Director and then the standard IPR text from RFC2026 sect 10.4 should
>be used. No ?

An interesting question.  This is Informational, not standards track.  And
they do note that there is an IPR notice on the IETF site.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)