Re: ID-NITS on: draft-smith-urn-mpeg-01.txt

[Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>]

  *> 
  *> Since this came in via RFC-Editor, maybe they should already
  *> have taken care of this ?? Or maybe they will when they edit it
  *> and maybe we should just ignore this.
  *> 
  *> Long line at 6 with 106 chars, only spaces extra
  *> Long line at 52 with 75 chars
  *> Long page at 59
  *> Long line at 82 with 73 chars
  *> Long line at 117 with 75 chars
  *> Long line at 186 with 76 chars
  *> Long line at 252 with 75 chars
  *> Long line at 275 with 73 chars, only spaces extra
  *> Long line at 281 with 77 chars
  *> Long line at 282 with 76 chars
  *> Long line at 283 with 78 chars
  *> Long line at 284 with 77 chars
  *> Long line at 289 with 73 chars, only spaces extra
  *> Long line at 305 with 81 chars
  *> Long line at 307 with 78 chars
  *> Long line at 313 with 76 chars
  *> Long line at 318 with 75 chars
  *> Long line at 339 with 73 chars, only spaces extra
  *> Long line at 384 with 75 chars
  *> Long line at 450 with 75 chars
  *> -: 19 lines longer than 72 characters, max 106
  *> -: 1 pages longer than 58 lines, max 450 lines

Bert,

Line and page length issues (and some other minor typographical and
editorial flaws that are not content-related) we customarily leave for
the final editing.  We could take a pass on these minor problems before
passing an independent submission to the IESG, but I think that it
would be more efficient to just let the final edit take care of it.
We understood that the IESG review was primarily for content.

  *> 
  *> Need to expand URN and MPEG in title

It was our judgment that URN and MPEG are so widely known that they
do not need expansion in the title, but we are happy to get feedback
on this issue.

Bob Braden, for the RFC Editor

  *> 
  *> Thanks,
  *> Bert 
  *>