[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-08.txt
> Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain
> Erik Nordmark [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ]
I didn't see anything about autorization/access control in
the document. Presumably there is something an implementation needs
to do to associate authority for certain TE links with a particular
IPsec SA.
Nit:
In two places it explicitly talks about 224.0.0.1 even though the
document supports IPv6 for example:
the control channel. This is done by sending the Config message to
the Multicast address (224.0.0.1). The ConfigAck and ConfigNack
How about at least saying "224.0.0.1 or ff02::1" instead.
Erik