[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)

To: harald@alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:02:13 -0700
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
References: <200304301854.h3UIsXK27620@windsor.research.att.com> <394590481.1051722137@localhost>
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d

IMHO, 2234 on its own could probably advance to draft without any editing.
All we should need is an implementation report.

(I have an implementation, Harald has an implementation, Jon was mentioning
a couple of parsers that the SIP group used...)

  Bill

References:
- Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
  - From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
- Re: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: IESG view of "problem"
Next by Date: Liason to IEEE 802
Previous by thread: Re: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
Next by thread: RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread