[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: HEELLLLOOOOOO: - Re: FW: Application for port-number (more tech)

To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Subject: RE: HEELLLLOOOOOO: - Re: FW: Application for port-number (more tech)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:02:23 -0700
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
In-reply-to: <200305051612.h45GC0e29060@windsor.research.att.com>

At 09:11 AM 5/5/2003 -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:

So, please, let's focus the discussion of how stupid I am on that I didn't
know that there was a registry for service names, not that I think that
the port numbers are the only thing that IANA does.

by all means... I'm simply suggesting that someplace between Apple and some working group there needs to be some clarification...

References:
- RE: HEELLLLOOOOOO: - Re: FW: Application for port-number (more tech)
  - From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: IS-IS Cryptographic Authentication to Informational
Next by Date: RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
Previous by thread: RE: HEELLLLOOOOOO: - Re: FW: Application for port-number (more tech)
Next by thread: Network Processing Forum to release first service API
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread