RE: agenda

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I think it is OK for the Documents that we have on the agenda.

Is it also OK to include possible management items that might
have ptrs to very rough responses to appeals or any random
topic we have there?

Is it also OK to have possible ptrs to very early WG charters,
in which we sometimes list propsed WG chairs that are not
yet known in public?

Is it also OK to see some action items that may be of confidential
nature? I am not sure we have any such.. but it seems possible that
they might be there at some times.

Oh well... I am all for openness. but we should be carefull, cause
sometimes I think I have seen things on that web page that we 
probably rather do not make public (yet).

Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: dinsdag 6 mei 2003 16:34
> To: Russ Housley; Randy Bush; iesg
> Subject: Re: agenda
> 
> 
> the question came up on the problem-statement list. I see no 
> particular 
> reason why not.
> 
> so - to be very precise - should I instruct the secretariat 
> to move/shadow 
> the URL
> 
> https://www1.ietf.org/IESG/internal/agenda.html
> 
> into an URL like http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html - and 
> keep it updated?
> 
> (I *think* all the URLs are publicly-visible ones - when we 
> turn them into 
> tracker links, we've got to point them at the public tracker for the 
> external agenda and internal tracker for the internal 
> agenda... bother...)
> 
> To make a deadline.... if I hear no objections by Thursday 
> evening, I will 
> so instruct.....
> 
>                     Harald
> 
> 
> 
> --On onsdag, april 30, 2003 14:18:54 -0400 Russ Housley 
> <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> > Good idea.
> >
> > At 10:29 AM 4/30/2003 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> would it be a good thing to make the agenda for the next telechat
> >> visible to the public so they know what to scream about, push, ...?
> >>
> >> randy
> >
> >
> 
>