[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)

To: harald@alvestrand.no
Subject: RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 09:16:49 -0700
Cc: ned.freed@mrochek.com, iesg@ietf.org
References: <200305052212.h45MC2n03594@windsor.research.att.com> <01KVJHN6D52U009UCV@mauve.mrochek.com> <944600000.1052199728@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d

>Dave Crocker went through this exercise some time back, and he found one 
>more unused feature: the %x01.02.03 syntax for writing multiple-byte values 
>without repeating the %x prefix.

It's used in several of the specs that Ned references.  It's used
extensively in e.g. SIP (RFC 3261) to designate case-sensitive strings.

  Bill

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
  - From: ned.freed@mrochek.com

References:
- RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
  - From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
- RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
  - From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
- RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: Evaluation: draft-ietf-dnsext-unknown-rrs - Handling of Unknown DNS Resource Record Types to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: request for BCP publication of an individual I-D submission
Previous by thread: RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
Next by thread: RE: Advance RFC 2234? (was Re: DISCUSS on UTF-8 to Standard)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread