[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt



Thomas,

>>  Suggested text below. First time I do that, so feel free
>>  to flame :)

> Is this document really one that falls under the "interferes with WG?"

It is.

> I don't want to overuse this category to pushback on everything. My
> impression was more like no body thinks very much of this document,

this too.

> and the author is a PITA when it comes to making changes, no matter
> how trivial/obvious.

I don't think anyone was even interested in proposing any changes to
it.

Alex