[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt

To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 15:00:21 -0400
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Message from zinin@psg.com of "Tue, 06 May 2003 11:52:07 PDT." <239506429.20030506115207@psg.com>

>  Suggested text below. First time I do that, so feel free
>  to flame :)

Is this document really one that falls under the "interferes with WG?"
I don't want to overuse this category to pushback on everything. My
impression was more like no body thinks very much of this document,
and the author is a PITA when it comes to making changes, no matter
how trivial/obvious.

Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

References:
- Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Fwd: Re: draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
Next by Date: For Your Review: draft-mrose-ietf-posting-02.txt
Previous by thread: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
Next by thread: Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread