Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt

[Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>]

Bert,

>> > Is this document really one that falls under the
>> "interferes with WG?"
>> 
>> It is.
>> 
>> > I don't want to overuse this category to pushback on everything. My
>> > impression was more like no body thinks very much of this document,
>> 
>> this too.
>> 
> So I think both points should be made, no?

How about this.

The IESG has considered draft-srisuresh-ospf-te. The subject of the
draft is within the charter of the OSPF WG that is completing its work
on OSPF traffic engineering extensions (draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic).
draft-srisuresh-ospf-te was discussed in and rejected by the OSPF WG.
Given the above, and the work items expected to be taken on by the
CCAMP WG (including inter-area traffic engineering), the IESG believes
that publishing draft-srisuresh-ospf-te as an RFC at this moment would
interfere with ongoing activities within these WGs. The IESG recommends
that the RFC Editor does not publish draft-srisuresh-ospf-te at this
moment.

Alex