RE: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> Thomas,
> 
> >>  Suggested text below. First time I do that, so feel free
> >>  to flame :)
> 
> > Is this document really one that falls under the 
> "interferes with WG?"
> 
> It is.
> 
> > I don't want to overuse this category to pushback on everything. My
> > impression was more like no body thinks very much of this document,
> 
> this too.
> 
So I think both points should be made, no?

Bert