FWD: RFC Editor: Fast Tracking Request

[Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>]

IESG,

Here's a request for RFC Fast Tracking that went a little differently than
usual, but better to know ahead of time that the RFC-Editor is willing to
give numbers in this case.  When I saw it at first, I thought it was a problem
because there was unlikely to be time for the large drafts to have expedited
publication, and expedited numbers were not ok anymore.

Would people be OK about asking the Secretariat to request assignment of
these numbers?

Allison
------- Forwarded Message


Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 09:59:17 -0700
From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, casner@acm.org, csp@csperkins.org
Subject: Fast Tracking Request [csp@csperkins.org: Status of RTP spec and profile RFCs]

Allison and Jon,

We received the message below regarging
<draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-12.txt> and
<draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-13.txt>.  The message requests advanced
RFC numbers for these documents.  If you agree with the request,
please have the IESG Secretariat send us notification to assign these
numbers.

Thank you.

RFC Editor

- ----- Forwarded message from Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> -----

To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, mankin@psg.com
Subject: Status of RTP spec and profile RFCs
cc: casner@acm.org
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:33:23 -0400
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0
	tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.43
X-Spam-Level: *

RFC Editor, Allison, 

We've just received the following message from the ITU, who wish to
reference the new versions of the RTP specification and A/V Profile 
from H.323 version 5. In order to do this, they need RFC numbers for
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-12.txt and draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-13.txt, 
both of which are in the queue for publication as Draft Standards.

If it is possible to get the RFC numbers assigned for these drafts by 
the time of the ITU SG 16 meeting, from 20-30 May, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Colin Perkins (AVT co-chair)



- ------- Forwarded Message

- --> "Paul E. Jones" writes:
>From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
>To: <csp@ISI.EDU>, <casner@acm.org>
>Cc: "Vivek Bhargava" <vbharga@cisco.com>
>Subject: H.323v5 / RTP+RTCP / SRTP
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 02:46:33 -0400
>
>Gentlemen,
>
>We're preparing text for H.323 version 5 for approval in May 2003.  It 
>had been our hope for a while that, by the time we approved this spec, 
>that the new RTP/RTCP and related profile documents would be completed 
>and an RFC number assigned.
>
>Can you comment on whether the drafts that will replace RFC 1889 and RFC 
>1890 will be approved by the end of May?
>
>Also, do you expect the SRTP work to be completed?
>
>(By completed, I mean approved and assigned an RFC number that can be 
>referenced.)
>
>Thanks,
>Paul E. Jones
>Rapporteur, ITU-T Q2/16
>
- ------- End of Forwarded Message

- ----- End forwarded message -----

------- End of Forwarded Message