RE: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Sounds good to me now

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Zinin [mailto:zinin@psg.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 6 mei 2003 23:53
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Thomas Narten; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed IESG statement on draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-05.txt
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> >> > Is this document really one that falls under the
> >> "interferes with WG?"
> >> 
> >> It is.
> >> 
> >> > I don't want to overuse this category to pushback on 
> everything. My
> >> > impression was more like no body thinks very much of 
> this document,
> >> 
> >> this too.
> >> 
> > So I think both points should be made, no?
> 
> How about this.
> 
> The IESG has considered draft-srisuresh-ospf-te. The subject of the
> draft is within the charter of the OSPF WG that is completing its work
> on OSPF traffic engineering extensions 
> (draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic).
> draft-srisuresh-ospf-te was discussed in and rejected by the OSPF WG.
> Given the above, and the work items expected to be taken on by the
> CCAMP WG (including inter-area traffic engineering), the IESG believes
> that publishing draft-srisuresh-ospf-te as an RFC at this moment would
> interfere with ongoing activities within these WGs. The IESG 
> recommends
> that the RFC Editor does not publish draft-srisuresh-ospf-te at this
> moment.
> 
> Alex
>