Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of Multiparty Multimedia Session Control (mmusic)

["James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

Ok, thanx for the response.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Perkins" <csp@csperkins.org>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: "The IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>;
<iesg@ietf.org>; <iab@ietf.org>; <jo@ipdialog.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of Multiparty Multimedia
Session Control (mmusic)


> --> "James Kempf" writes:
> >This charter looks generally good, but the schedule seems extremely
> >aggressive to me. I'm not familiar with this working group, but
unless
> >there are lots of very motiviated people, very little controversy,
and
> >most of the work is well underway, it seems a stretch. Do the
chairs
> >believe the schedule is realistic?
>
> I'm reasonably happy with the schedule. The SDP, SDPng and RTSP work
has
> been underway for some time, and is well understood. Deadlines for
SDPng
> and RTSP are intentionally aggressive, to encourage closure.
>
> The IMG work is new, but is being driven by interactions with other
> standards groups and needs to meet the deadlines for that reason.
>
> Colin
>