Re: draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-07 versus 08 version

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <200305121613.h4CGD9124712@boreas.isi.edu>, Joyce Reynolds writes:
>
>
>It would have been nice if the RFC Editor had known sooner to use
><draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-08>, instead of the IESG approved (as a PS)
><draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-07>.  We already did the editing and nroffing of
>the 07 version.  IANA just finished its work on this document and sent
>us a message on 6 May.  We were in final editing stages to publish.

Sorry -- I blew the timing.  But the changes are fairly small; wdiff 
might do the trick.
>
>So, version 08 is the version (which I note has a write day of 8 May)
>is the one the RFC Editor should be using.  Can the IESG-Secretary send
>RFC Editor a note directing us to use 08 instead of 07?
>
That should indeed be done.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)