Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-gen-00.txt

[Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>]

Hi Harald,

At 10:47 PM 5/13/2003 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> I believe the RFCs listed in the General area could be better listed under 
> other areas.
>
> RFC 1122 should probably be reviewed in the INT area, and RFC 1123 should 
> probably be reviewed in the APP area.
> RFC 1812 should probably be reviewed in the RTG area.
These assignments make sense to me.  Unless the ADs involved have
any objections, I'll ask Phil to move them as indicated.

> Once the documents with issues have been moved out of the document, I 
> don't see much purpose in progressing this document further, except 
> possibly for completeness; there's certainly no WG in the General area 
> currently that is directly related to it, so if further work should be 
> done, it's fine with me if v6ops does it.
How/if it would make sense to progress this document would probably
depend on what we decide to do with the other documents...  Either
way, I agree that v6ops could take care of it.

Margaret