[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt

To: "Bill Fenner" <fenner@research.att.com>, <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt
From: "Michelle S. Cotton" <cotton@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:15:54 -0700
Cc: <iesg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200305142014.h4EKEtA03927@windsor.research.att.com>

Bill/Thomas,

I'm confused here.  Is there something that I need to be
concerned about or is there anything I have to do here?

Just checking.

Michelle


-----Original Message-----
From: iesg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Bill
Fenner
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 1:15 PM
To: narten@us.ibm.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt



>Actually, [option #88] never made it to RFC.

Yeah, I was just going by the IANA assignments.  I didn't know of the
push to reclaim assigned codes.  I assumed that the fact that the
extension was documented in the IANA registry itself was enough.

  Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

References:
- Re: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt
  - From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: FW: Last Call: Handling of Unknown DNS Resource Record Types to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: DNS Configuration Options for DHCPv6 to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-02.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread