--On 13. mai 2003 15:46 +1000 Steven Legg <steven.legg@adacel.com.au> wrote:
The IPR statements are needed in the RFC (says the lawyer). We've been sloppy, and lucky so far in not having been challenged on any matter where its absence matters.Add an IPR statement from RFC 2026.I was once told by a former IESG member that the IESG didn't bother with IPR sections, so I stopped putting them into my drafts. Recent RFCs don't seem to have them either, so I assume an IPR statement is still not needed.