RE: "problem" -- resend

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Should we make this part of the oob list or do we want to
keep this to IESG?

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: woensdag 21 mei 2003 0:41
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Steve Bellovin; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: "problem" -- resend
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --On 20. mai 2003 12:17 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" 
> <bwijnen@lucent.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > OK, let me try to make a start.
> >
> > One problem I see is that the current AD job is basically a
> > full time job, certainly if you consider a 40 hour work week.
> > Not sure if it has to be, but give the way we are currently
> > organized and given our current tools and procedures,
> > that is what it boils down to for me.
> >
> > I understand that I have two AD positions, but if I look at
> > the number of WGs that I am responsible for for both OPS and
> > SUB, it probably is not more than some of the ADs in the
> > other areas.
> >
> > So... is it just me, or do we indeed all have the feeling that
> > the AD job turns out to be a 40 hour a week job?
> >
> I certainly have that feeling, and had it as Apps AD too.
> (in fact less so as ops AD..... 30, perhaps?)
> 
> it's a rubber-band type of job - there's always more that you 
> know you 
> could have done, people you could have talked to, mailing 
> lists you could 
> have read, documents you could have reviewed, databases you 
> could have 
> scanned for things that are forgotten....
> 
> in order to limit it we might have to define "good enough" 
> criteria for 
> ourselves...... hard.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>