[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:13:36 +0100 (BST)
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, "" <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, "" <iesg@ietf.org>, "" <ietf@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <18041272266.20030523215329@brandenburg.com>
Organization: speaking for none
References: <200305231957.PAA23163@ietf.org> <20030523164919.164a908e.moore@cs.utk.edu><3ECE9D05.4C530F51@swin.edu.au> <3034502612.20030523200039@brandenburg.com><20030523235006.7fefae69.moore@cs.utk.edu> <18041272266.20030523215329@brandenburg.com>

On Fri, 23 May 2003, Dave Crocker wrote:

> IP over foo is not exactly packet science, that's why.

Ethertype in MIME would probably be more useful than IP in MIME.

L.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>

References:
- Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
  - From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
- Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
  - From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
- Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
- Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
  - From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
- Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: IP over MIME to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread