[iesg-secretary #7450] Recall for draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq-02.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I expect a new revision.
That new revision will go through some WG Last Call type of
process. Then I will put it back on IESG agenda to at least
get approval from IESG that the new rev is still OK.

I expect all that OKing and approval to happen.

I think it is best if you just remove it from your queue
and I will take care of IESG sending a new "approved" message
for the new revision.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Editor [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: woensdag 28 mei 2003 1:56
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Iesg-Secretary (E-mail); Iesg (E-mail); RFC Editor
> Subject: Re: Recall for draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq-02.txt
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> Should we remove this document from our queue and await a new approval
> message of the revised version?  Or should the document just be put on
> hold?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sandy
> 
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:45:37PM +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > RFC-Editor and IESG secretary,
> > 
> > We had approved draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq-02.txt for
> > publication as Informational RFC. It is a CCAMP WG doc.
> > 
> > However, after we did send it to the RFC-Editor queue,
> > a small set of concerns was uncovered that we had
> > forgotten to take into account. The doc is back to
> > the WG to address those comments.
> > 
> > I will update the ID-tracker accordingly.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bert 
>