Re: draft-ietf-isis-hmac-04

[Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>]

Alex:

I do not think that an RFC Ed note will handle number 3.  The RFC Ed does 
not want to receive documents in this form.  So, if they need to make a 
change (probably one nroff command), then they should probably deal with 
numbers 1 and 2 at the same time.

Russ

At 12:03 PM 5/28/2003 -0700, Alex Zinin wrote:
> Thanks, Russ. I'll add an rfc-ed note to it.
>
> --
> Alex
> http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
>
> Tuesday, May 27, 2003, 7:18:06 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> > Three editorial comments:
>
> >    1) In section 1, change "insure" to "ensure."
>
> >    2) In section 3, change "... lack of operator interest in deploying the
> > proposed revised mechanism" to " ... lack of operator interest in 
> deploying
> > a revised mechanism."
>
> >    3) The document should not be right justified.