RE: draft-aromanov-snmp-hiqa-04

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

That is what I think was part of my summary. It is a view from one specific
person. It has some (small piece) of reasonable (he claims high waulity)
consideratiosn for a few aspects of what one has to consider when
implementing an agent.

but what I also said in my summary (and proposed text for rfc-editor)
is that I do not feel that I should go to the SNMP crowd and try to
get serious review/consensus. It will be a big debate on what belongs
in here and on what is the best approach.

Pls see my comments that I posted last week. They are included in
the emailed agenda package as well.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Bellovin [mailto:smb@research.att.com]
> Sent: woensdag 28 mei 2003 23:02
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-aromanov-snmp-hiqa-04
> 
> 
> The contents seemed reasonable but disjointed -- the document looks 
> like a collection random SNMP programming tips.  It's not 
> obvious to me 
> that it's at all comprehensive.  Who from the SNMP implementor 
> community has looked at this?
> 
> 
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
> 		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of 
> "Firewalls" book)
> 
>