Re: draft-aromanov-snmp-hiqa-04

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15501AA0122@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.c
om>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
>That is what I think was part of my summary. It is a view from one specific
>person. It has some (small piece) of reasonable (he claims high waulity)
>consideratiosn for a few aspects of what one has to consider when
>implementing an agent.
>
>but what I also said in my summary (and proposed text for rfc-editor)
>is that I do not feel that I should go to the SNMP crowd and try to
>get serious review/consensus. It will be a big debate on what belongs
>in here and on what is the best approach.
>
>Pls see my comments that I posted last week. They are included in
>the emailed agenda package as well.
>

Thanks -- I was working from the Web agenda, so I didn't see that note.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)