[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Good work from BMWG co-chair



The below is I think a VERY good example of a WG chair who will
be trying to get their WG editors started on the correct track.

Maybe this is something we should promote for all chairs to do?

Thanks,
Bert 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) 
Sent: donderdag 29 mei 2003 11:36
To: Kevin Dubray; Randy Bush
Cc: Bert Wijnen; Al Morton
Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: [bmwg] New WG Deliverable Proposal - Core Router
Software Accelerated Life Testing]


Kevin wrote:

> On a not unrelated note, with the mcast methodology fiasco engrained
> on my brain, I'd like to counsel the principals as to their 
> perspective
> roles as BMWG editors, as opposed to individual I-D authors:
> 
>     1. Facilitators for the production of the associated BMWG goal(s) 
>        that are technically sound, useful, and ultimately workable.
> 
>     2. The responsibility to reflect the consensus of the WG in its
>        associated products, even if that consensus conflicts with the
>        editor's personal opinion.
> 
>     3. The requirement for continued and timely progress of the goal.
> 
> The main reason I would do this is because some I-D authors 
> can't or won't make the transition to WG I-D editors.  Reinforcing
> the ground rules ahead of time might help.
> 
Way to go !!

Bert
> -Kevin
> 
> 
>