[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Good work from BMWG co-chair
- To: "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: Good work from BMWG co-chair
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:55:35 +0200
The below is I think a VERY good example of a WG chair who will
be trying to get their WG editors started on the correct track.
Maybe this is something we should promote for all chairs to do?
Thanks,
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Sent: donderdag 29 mei 2003 11:36
To: Kevin Dubray; Randy Bush
Cc: Bert Wijnen; Al Morton
Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: [bmwg] New WG Deliverable Proposal - Core Router
Software Accelerated Life Testing]
Kevin wrote:
> On a not unrelated note, with the mcast methodology fiasco engrained
> on my brain, I'd like to counsel the principals as to their
> perspective
> roles as BMWG editors, as opposed to individual I-D authors:
>
> 1. Facilitators for the production of the associated BMWG goal(s)
> that are technically sound, useful, and ultimately workable.
>
> 2. The responsibility to reflect the consensus of the WG in its
> associated products, even if that consensus conflicts with the
> editor's personal opinion.
>
> 3. The requirement for continued and timely progress of the goal.
>
> The main reason I would do this is because some I-D authors
> can't or won't make the transition to WG I-D editors. Reinforcing
> the ground rules ahead of time might help.
>
Way to go !!
Bert
> -Kevin
>
>
>