[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: my issues with draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-lite-01.txt



Randy,

formalistically, it's not changes to UDP, it's a modified version of UDP.
not that it doesn't need justification, but you might want to change your writeup so that people don't waste time trying to convince each other that you haven't read the drafts properly.....

Harald

--On torsdag, mai 22, 2003 18:07:49 -0700 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

it seems my comments on the draft, actually comments from many ops
directorate members, were too massive, so i have stashed them at
<http://psg.com/~randy/udp-lite.txt> and want to compress it to the
following

this proposes somne serious changes to udp without sufficient
documentation of the justification and needs, at least not
sufficient to convince some ip old timers.  it would be good if the
document could give clear and detailed justification so that the ip
purists and operators could understand why this is _really_ needed.

randy