Re: my issues with draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-lite-01.txt

[Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>]

At Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:43:56 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> there was, I believe, a proposal for tweaking UDP to do the same thing, so 
> that the stuff would still be sent with protocol number 21, but with 
> different semantics. That would be a greater stupidity.
> 
> that's no longer on the table.
> 
> allison, am I misremembering?

spent a lot of time staring at packet dumps in octal, have we?

but yes, i remember this too, whether it really happened or not.