[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DNP note for draft-allan-mpls-loadbal
Harald,
[secretariat dropped]
It's a "do not publish because it is a technically flawed
thing attempting to end run" :) i.e., both. I was not sure
how to express this. Suggestions are welcome.
--
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:42:15 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> is this a "do not publish because of technical flaws" or "do not publish
> because it's an end run"?
> Harald
> --On mandag, juni 09, 2003 21:59:17 -0700 Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> wrote:
>> Discussed with the WG chairs.
>> Proposed DNP note below.
>> Running the exact text by the WG chairs too.
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>> http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
>>
>> Dear RFC Editor-
>>
>> The IESG has considered draft-allan-mpls-loadbal and has consulted
>> the chairs of the MPLS WG. The subject of the draft is within the
>> charter of the MPLS WG and was discussed by it. The discussion in the
>> WG revealed serious technical issues in the approach described in the
>> draft, which lead to the WG rejecting the document. Therefore, the
>> IESG recommends that the RFC editor does not publish this draft.
>>
>>