[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNP note for draft-allan-mpls-loadbal



Harald,

  [secretariat dropped]

  It's a "do not publish because it is a technically flawed
  thing attempting to end run" :) i.e., both. I was not sure
  how to express this. Suggestions are welcome.

-- 
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/

Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:42:15 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> is this a "do not publish because of technical flaws" or "do not publish 
> because it's an end run"?

>               Harald


> --On mandag, juni 09, 2003 21:59:17 -0700 Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> wrote:

>> Discussed with the WG chairs.
>> Proposed DNP note below.
>> Running the exact text by the WG chairs too.
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>> http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
>>
>> Dear RFC Editor-
>>
>>  The IESG has considered draft-allan-mpls-loadbal and has consulted
>>  the chairs of the MPLS WG. The subject of the draft is within the
>>  charter of the MPLS WG and was discussed by it. The discussion in the
>>  WG revealed serious technical issues in the approach described in the
>>  draft, which lead to the WG rejecting the document. Therefore, the
>>  IESG recommends that the RFC editor does not publish this draft.
>>
>>