Re: Issue with -00 cut-off

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <5.2.0.9.2.20030611163847.03d5f758@mail.binhost.com>, Russ Housley w
rites:
>Harald:
>
>>Is it OK if, in order to simplify procedures for the secretariat, we say 
>>that -00 requests in "late week" have to be WG documents, and come in 
>>email FROM the chairs?
>
>Since -00 drafts already need WG Chair approval, I would prefer to keep the 
>rules simple.  How about:
>
>    Individual -00 documents 3 weeks prior to IETF.
>    WG -00 document 2 weeks prior to IETF.   (Still require WG Chair approval)

I think I'd add the caveat to chairs that this should be reserved for 
exceptional cases.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)