Updated DNP note draft-allan-mpls-loadbal

[Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>]

Below.
-- 
Alex

Dear RFC Editor-

The IESG has considered draft-allan-mpls-loadbal and has consulted
the chairs of the MPLS WG. The subject of the draft is within the
charter of the MPLS WG and was discussed by it. However, there was
no consensus in the WG that publishing this document is a good idea
for the following reason:

  The WG intentionally left the subject described in the document
  unspecified. Suggestions made in the document are not generally
  agreed on to match existing and deployed implementation, hence
  publishing them as IETF guidelines would mislead the reader.

Therefore, the IESG recommends that the RFC editor does not publish
this draft.

If the RFC Editor wishes to publish this despite the IESG's
recommendation, the IESG would like the following IESG note to be
placed upon it:

  IESG NOTE:

  This document was reviewed in the IETF MPLS WG, and was found
  misleading due to inconsistency with existing and deployed MPLS LSR
  implementations. The document does NOT represent IETF guidelines for
  MPLS load-balancing.

The IESG would also recommend to change the title of the document
accordingly.