Re: : L2VPN charter rev 02 (final?)

[Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>]

It appears that Allison and I (at least) need to discuss this subject
more, and this might take some time. In the interest of making
progress on the VPN front, I will remove task 6 from the charter for
now, push the two VPN charters ahead, and schedule some time for us to
discuss this subject in Vienna.

-- 
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/

Thursday, June 12, 2003, 10:14:16 AM, Allison Mankin wrote:
> Alex,

> My issue with this charter is task 6, even though it is
> is deferred till later - interworking the dissimilar L2 encapsulations
> is a very large expansion of the sub-ip scope for IETF.  PWE3 is not
> chartered for encapsulation interworking, so the control work you would
> be doing would be for ITU specs, I guess.  But these are again a large
> expansion of our scope, and probably change the sub-ip architecture
> picture.

> I would support the charter if it did not have task 6. 

> Nit: VPLS and VPWS acronyms are not introduced