[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Evaluation: draft-nesser-otp-sha-256-384-512 - AES Companion Hash Definitions (SHA256, SHA384, SHA512) for OTP to Proposed Standard



I think I have not written up my DISCUSS - at least it did not make it to the ballot. Here it is.

--On 2. juni 2003 11:52 -0400 IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [ X ]      [   ]
The document uses C code fragments to specify its algorithms, but uses libraries the functionality of which is not defined in the document (the sha functions and structures).

This violates the IESG guidelines on use of formal languages:
<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/pseudo-code-in-specs.txt>

If the libraries are completely specified in the FIPS document referenced, a sentence saying that is sufficient.
NOTE: The FIPS document is a normative reference.