[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comment: draft-ietf-manet-olsr-10.txt
The analysis of congestion avoidance is light. While it's good that
only the MPR in each single-hop cluster floods, that is still quite a
large number of flooding nodes in the dense nets described. But this
is an Experimental, so it seems acceptable to let it go forward.
That said, I have a suggestion to improve the impact when OLSR shares the
net with other traffic. Synchronization prevention is only a MAY because
it is viewed as a nuisance for the protocol, but not viewed as a concern
for surrounding traffic. However, waves of synchronized routing flood and
forwarding are problems for coexisting TCP traffic on a net, so I suggest
that the jittering in be upgraded from a MAY to a SHOULD or even a MUST.
Allison