OK, updated message with Bert's suggestion below.
Should I ask the secretariat to send it or should one of
us do it on behalf of the IESG? (The latter seems better
to me, since it is not a formal action message.)
--
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
The IESG discussed final approval of L2VPN and L3VPN Working Groups at
the IESG telechat on June 26, 2003. The IESG considered the feedback
provided by the IETF community and would like to thank all people who
expressed their opinion. Given that creation of the two WGs is
proposed as part of separation of L2 VPN and L3 VPN work within the
existing PPVPN WG (which will be closed as a result), and that the scope
of work is not being extended beyond the limits effective for PPVPN,
the IESG decided to approve formation of the two new WGs. Formal
announcement will be sent out by the secretariat shortly.