[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Informationals to Historic?

To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, "'iesg@ietf.org'" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Informationals to Historic?
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:44:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <0449D80A0E9B614A83FA9031B07E8D3B257C47@stntexch2.va.neustar.com>
References: <0449D80A0E9B614A83FA9031B07E8D3B257C47@stntexch2.va.neustar.com>

--On tirsdag, juli 01, 2003 16:06:11 -0500 "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote:

Do we ever move Informational documents to Historic status, when the
practices they describe are no longer meaningful or valid? Or is Historic
reserved for actual standards?

in the cases we've done it, it's been because what they describe isn't just no longer meaningful, it's toxic.

I don't see much reason to waste cycles on doing so.

Harald

References:
- Informationals to Historic?
  - From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed message about L2VPN and L3VPN WG creation
Next by Date: Re: Proposed message about L2VPN and L3VPN WG creation
Previous by thread: Informationals to Historic?
Next by thread: RE: Informationals to Historic?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread