RE: Informationals to Historic?

["Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>]

What do you think about RFC1480? Toxic or merely irrelevant?

- J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:44 PM
> To: Peterson, Jon; 'iesg@ietf.org'
> Subject: Re: Informationals to Historic?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --On tirsdag, juli 01, 2003 16:06:11 -0500 "Peterson, Jon" 
> <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Do we ever move Informational documents to Historic status, when the
> > practices they describe are no longer meaningful or valid? 
> Or is Historic
> > reserved for actual standards?
> 
> in the cases we've done it, it's been because what they 
> describe isn't just 
> no longer meaningful, it's toxic.
> 
> I don't see much reason to waste cycles on doing so.
> 
>               Harald
>