[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-action #1968] from lines on IETF messages]

To: mlee@foretec.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-action #1968] from lines on IETF messages]
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:44:27 -0700
Cc: harald@alvestrand.no, iesg@ietf.org, bfuller@foretec.com
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d

I like the idea of having the announcements come from
iesg-secretary@ietf.org representing the IESG, as they do now.
Is there a problem getting the address properly forged in the
automated system or was this a decision that iesg-secretary@ietf.org
is bad?

Thanks,
  Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-action #1968] from lines on IETF messages]
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Reaction to T-shirts
Next by Date: RE: FW: Newly updated draft-ietf-atommib-atm2-19.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-action #1968] from lines on IETF messages]
Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-action #1968] from lines on IETF messages]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread