Another rev, I'd like to close this one out on Thursday's call. This document arrived via an RFC editor request to publish as informational. I recommend that it not be published. Proposed note: The IESG requests that this document not be published as an RFC. The document proposes extensions to PPP that are not supported by the WG. Specifically, in response to discussion on the PPPEXT mailing list, the WG chair reported "I think the consensus is clear: Existing mechanisms are adequate to the task." The PPPEXT WG considers the addition of PPP options that are not directly related to PPP harmful to the protocol, and therefore opposes publication of this document. Publishing this document would be considered an end run around the wishes of the PPPEXT WG. Thomas