[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RE: Liaison statement from ITU-T Q.11/13 to IETF (mobileip, mpls WGs) on "Draft Recommendation Y.MIPoMPLS (Mobile IP Services over MPLS)"



I believe that we have lately our liason responses that we
did send back to ITU recorded. So that seems good to do 
for this one too.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: woensdag 9 juli 2003 15:32
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: FWD: RE: Liaison statement from ITU-T Q.11/13 to IETF
> (mobileip, mpls WGs) on "Draft Recommendation Y.MIPoMPLS (Mobile IP
> Services over MPLS)" 
> 
> 
> Question: we currently post liaison statements on our web page. Should
> we be doing anything similar with responses we send back? In theory,
> I'd say yes, but things could get tricky deciding when a response is
> formal/worthy enough of posting on the web page.
> 
> Thomas
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> From: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
> To: <nadine.joubert@itu.int>, <statements@ietf.org>
> Cc: <sebek@itu.int>, <Gabrielle.Regan@itu.int>, <gab@sun.com>,
>    <proberts@megisto.com>, <swallow@cisco.com>, <loa@pi.se>, 
> <sob@harvard.edu>,
>    <narten@us.ibm.com>, <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:46:40 -0500
> Subject: RE: Liaison statement from  ITU-T Q.11/13 to IETF 
> (mobileip, mpls WGs) on "Draft Recommendation Y.MIPoMPLS 
> (Mobile IP Services over MPLS)" 
> Thread-Topic: Liaison statement from  ITU-T Q.11/13 to IETF 
> (mobileip, mpls WGs) on "Draft Recommendation Y.MIPoMPLS 
> (Mobile IP Services over MPLS)" 
> Thread-Index: AcMl7yjPjPk31D6BQlKr/LeTA4wfogVWsTXA
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thank you for the information related to the ongoing work in ITU-T
> on the subject of Mobile IP services over MPLS. We (Mobile IP WG
> chairs) have informed the Mobile IP working group about the ongoing
> work and had sought feedback from the WG members. 
> 
> At this time, there is no interest in the IETFs Mobile IP working
> group on this topic. The focus (in IETFs Mobile IP WG) remains
> primarily on enabling a solution that is L3 based. At this time we do
> not have any specific comments about the solution being discussed in
> SG13 (Y.MIPoMPLS) of ITU-T. 
> 
> Regards,
> Mobile IP WG chairs
> (Basavaraj Patil, Gabriel Montenegro, Phil Roberts)
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext nadine.joubert@itu.int [mailto:nadine.joubert@itu.int]
> > Sent: 29 May, 2003 09:32 AM
> > To: statements@ietf.org
> > Cc: sebek@itu.int; Gabrielle.Regan@itu.int; gab@sun.com;
> > proberts@megisto.com; Patil Basavaraj (NET/Dallas); 
> swallow@cisco.com;
> > loa@pi.se
> > Subject: Liaison statement from ITU-T Q.11/13 to IETF 
> (mobileip, mpls
> > WGs) on "Draft Recommendation Y.MIPoMPLS (Mobile IP Services 
> > over MPLS)"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please find attached a liaison statement from Q.11/13 
> Rapporteur Group
> > (Sophia Antipolis, 14-16 May 2003) of ITU-T Study Group 13 on "Draft
> > Recommendation Y.MIPoMPLS (Mobile IP Services over MPLS)" 
> > addressed to IETF
> > (mobileip WG and mpls WG) for your consideration and comments.
> > 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > Georges Sebek
> > 
> >  <<LS-IETF_ymipompls.pdf>>  <<028e.pdf>> 
> > 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>